Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Harrod

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1932No. 22308PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHooper, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) After a careful consideration of the demurrer to the plaintiff’s original petition and to the petition as finally amended, we are satisfied that the court properly overruled each and every ground thereof with the exception of that ground of the demurrer (filed November 7, 1931) which complains that the contract of insurance upon which suit was brought was not set forth. In our opinion that ground of the demurrer should have been sustained, and the petition, unless amended to cure such defect, should have been dismissed. The certificate attached to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaynok v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Carruth v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Lipshitz v. New Zealand InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  4. Underwriters' Agency v. SutherlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cherokee Credit Life Insurance v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Ætna Life Insurance v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Lancaster v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Cutledge v. Ætna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. National-Ben Franklin Insurance v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API