Legal Opinion

Sturgill v. Ashe Memorial Hospital, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 2007No. COA06-1476PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment because of failure to have medical care reviewed by a certifying expert as required for a medical malpractice action by Rule 9(j) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. The dispos-itive issue in this case is whether the use of restraints on a patient is a medical procedure. Because we conclude that the use of restraints in the case sub judice is a medical procedure, we affirm.

I. Background

“A medical assessment for the use of restraints can be delicate and complex, and as such, requires the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Anderson v. AssimosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. City of Thomasville v. Lease-Afex, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Thigpen v. NgoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Smith v. KeatorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Hart v. BrienzaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Mitchell, Brewer, Richardson, Adams, Burge & Boughman, PLLC v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Fullwood v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Inland American Winston Hotels, Inc. v. CrockettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API