Legal Opinion

Hanser v. Youngs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 7PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to Wayne; Codd (George P.), J. Case by Peter Hanser against Addison S. Youngs for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff, a resident of Detroit, was a stone cutter by trade in the employ of a Mr. Michaels. On Sunday, November 11, 1917, plaintiff, his brother-in-law, Mr. Kinsler, with Mr. Michaels and his minor son, drove up into Oakland county to get their potatoes for the winter. The truck used on the trip was owned by Mr. Michaels and was driven by Mr. Kinsler. On their return to Detroit, and when near the eight-mile road coming down Woodward avenue, a wheel came off and Mr. Kinsler went for some one to tow them in. The pavement here is of concrete 18 or 19 feet in width. An interurban track runs at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Stroud v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Jaquith v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Graham v. HagmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Beaucage v. MercerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bostrom v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Sherman v. KorffMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Frisorger v. ShepseMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Lima Used Car Exchange Co. v. HemperlyOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Bushie v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API