Abdallah v. Boumil
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodman, J.
Abdallah’s appeal from a decree after the rescript previously issued in this case (Abdallah v. Boumil, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 829 [1974]) attacks the determination by a Probate Court of (1) costs and expenses and (2) interest — items awarded to his sisters, the other three heirs at law. The judge made a report of material facts; the proceedings are reported.
1. The determination in the decree after rescript of costs and expenses cannot stand. It is clear from the record, including the transcript of the proceedings, and it is conceded in the sisters’ brief that no evidence was introduced in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hayden v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Boynton v. TarbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Dwyer v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Spilios v. PappsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Sullivan v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Waldman v. American Honda Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Manganaro Drywall, Inc. v. White Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Mahoney v. MahoneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Tabler v. WellerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- Waldman v. American Honda Motor Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.