Legal Opinion

C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 13, 1946No. (C. D. 1023)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

The Norton Co. of Chippawa, Canada, exported to its parent company, the Norton Co. of Worcester, Mass., a shipment of merchandise invoiced as “Crude Artificial Abrasive (#38 Alun-dum).” Plaintiff, a customs brokerage firm, entered the goods at Buffalo where the collector of customs classified the same as refined bauxite under paragraph 6 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1001, par. 6), assessing duty thereunder at one-half of 1 cent per pound. Plaintiff’s principal claim is for free entry of the shipment under the provision in paragraph 1672 of the Tariff Act of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrison Supply Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API