Whittier v. Stetson & Post Mill Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from, Superior Court, King County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J.
The respondents Brodelt and Schlessinger and one Nugent planned the erection of a building upon land at the northwest corner of South Third and Washington streets, in the city of Seattle. The land embraced lot *191o, block 9, in D. S. Maynard’s plat, which formed the street corner and fronted sixty feet on South Third street, and 108 feet upon Washington street, and the south half of lot 6, fronting thirty feet on South Third street, and having the same depth as lot 5. The building was thus to be a parallelogram, 90 by 108 feet in size. Of this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- De Witt v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Willamette Steam Mills Co. v. KremerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Tredinnick v. Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
- Dexter Horton & Co. v. SparkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Kellogg v. Littell & Smythe Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Powell v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Bolster v. StocksWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Shreeder v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Fircrest Supply, Inc. v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981