Riggen v. Lindley
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Defendants, together with one Young, were associated in owning and operating a threshing machine, using for convenience in the conduct of such business the name “Fairland Threshing Company.” They were indebted to Brule State Bank, *345and desired to borrow some money for the purpose of retiring said indebtedness, and had requested plaintiff to make them a loan for that purpose. Plaintiff held a $3,100 certificate of deposit issued by Reliance Savings Bank, where all parties did their banking business, and had discussed the situation to some extent with the defendant Powers, who was actively…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Security Nat. Bank of Sioux City v. Old Nat. Bank of Battle CreekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Cohen v. First National Bank of NogalesArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Dille v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. FaulknerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- LPN Trust v. Farrar Outdoor Advertising, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- McDonald v. Miners & Merchants Bank, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- LPN Trust v. Farrar Outdoor Advertising, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- McDonald v. Miners & Merchants Bank, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981