Legal Opinion

In re Hixson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1988No. C7-88-1499PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLEMING, Acting Judge.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s November 1987 and June 1988 findings, conclusions and orders enforcing the commission’s decision, finding appellant in contempt, and awarding attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

*2FACTS

Respondent filed a complaint with the Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights alleging discrimination based on race and national origin. The department found probable cause and referred the charge to the Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights. The commission found appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Hopp v. HoppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Kachman v. BlosbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API