Legal Opinion

Cale v. City of Bessemer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 2, 1980No. 79-352PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs, Robert T. Cale and Ruth C. Cale, appeal from a finding by the trial court that a Bessemer municipal zoning ordinance which zoned their property for residential use was not arbitrary and capricious as applied to their property. We affirm.

The plaintiffs are owners of a 7 1/2 acre tract of vacant land which is located in the City of Bessemer. The property is triangularly shaped and runs along the southeast side of U.S. Highway 11. It is bordered on the eastern side by residences and on the southern side by a church and undeveloped acreage. For covenience, a map of the area is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waters v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Cudd v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Allen v. AxfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  4. Gertz v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Come v. ChancySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Craig Const. Co., Inc. v. HendrixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Byrd Companies, Inc. v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Jefferson Cty. v. O'RorkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. City of Birmingham v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Woodard v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API