Thoms v. Gunnelson

The jury found plaintiff causally negligent in respect to lookout and the first question which plaintiff raises is whether the jury.was properly instructed on this subject. The instruction given by the court was a standard one and we regard it as adequate and appropriate to the situation which the evidence disclosed. Plaintiff does not contend it to be erroneous but asserts it should have been supplemented by the following which he requested but which the trial court refused to give:

“Thoms having, upon entering the intersection, observed Gunnelson’s car, and having concluded that it was…