Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Yayeshwork Abay and Burhan Amare v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General and Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 19, 2004No. 02-3795Published

1Concurring in the judgmentSutton, Circuit Judge

CONCURRENCE

I agree with the majority that the prospect of female genital mutilation (FGM) may indeed give rise to a “well-founded fear” of persecution, and I agree with the majority that the Immigration Judge’s efforts to resolve the claims of the daughter (Amare) and the mother (Abay) raise as many questions as they answer. On this record, I thus agree that the Immigration Judge’s decision cannot be affirmed.

I concur in the judgment rather than in the opinion because I fear that the majority’s opinion accepts two propositions in this area that current law does not support: (1) that women or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nadarjh Ramsameachire v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Eunice Oritsegbeyiwa Azanor v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Adelaide Abankwah v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Doris C. Oforji v. John D. Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Teodor Tamas-Mercea v. Janet Reno and the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API