Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Sutcliffe

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 13, 1967No. 44,827PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

This appeal requires construction of an express trust and, more specifically, of provisions relating to final disposition of the trust property. The trust was established for the purpose of carrying out the terms of a property settlement agreement entered into between Joe H. Sutcliffe and Velma E. Sutcliffe, his wife.

The following facts were developed during a trial in the court below. Marital difficulties arose between the parties and a separation occurred.' The couple owned considerable property. Some of the real estate was held in joint…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Foss v. WilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  2. Price, Administrator v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Cameron v. Hicks.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Dyal v. BruntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Wright v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mark Twain Kansas City Bank v. Kroh Bros. DevelopmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. In re the Estate of PickrellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Estate of Bennett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  4. In Re Estate of MurdockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. In Re the Estate of PickrellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API