Legal Opinion

Dyal v. Brunt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1942No. 35,437PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This was an action to construe a will and. to recover *142property plaintiff alleged he was entitled to under it. The court acceded to the request of the parties to pass upon the legal questions involved in the construction of the will in advance of the trial upon questions of fact. The trial court construed the will contrary to plaintiff's contention in at least one important particular, and he has appealed.

The pertinent facts are not controverted and may be stated as follows: The plaintiff, Albert T. Dyal, born October 10, 1903, is the son and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Markham v. WatermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. McNutt v. McCombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Ernst v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Zabel v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Bullock v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Clutter v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. In Re Estate of WorksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Mydland v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. In Re Estate of HauckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Johnston v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API