Legal Opinion

Millican v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1925No. 7 Div. 545PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Plaintiff in this cause suffered a nonsuit in the trial court, where demurrers were sustained to each count of his complaint, and prosecutes this appeal under the provision of section 6431 of the Code of 1923.

Plaintiff had a contract with defendant by which he was to sell a certain tract of land for defendant on commission. A paragraph of the contract, which was in writing, provided :

“It is further mutually agreed by and between the parties hereto that this contract is not subject to cancellation or revocation without the written consent of both parties, and same may be extended and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Pollock & Co. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Henderson v. VincentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Chambers v. SeaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Beck v. West & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gulf Trading Co. v. RadcliffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Bankers' Mortgage Bond Co. v. SproullSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Dothan Oil Mill Co. v. EspySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Smith v. BrassealeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Fitzpatrick v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API