Dothan Oil Mill Co. v. Espy
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
.BROWN,. J.
(after stating the facts as above).
If we assume that the purchase of cotton seed, by the respondents from the producers and others, to be crushed at their respective mills in this state, and manufactured into cotton seed oil and other by-prodnets, involves acts of interstate commerce, the contention of appellants, that the case made by the bill is one within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission and the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, is fully answered by the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Federal Trade Commission v. Klesner, 280 U. S. 19,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Anderson v. Shipowners Assn. of Pacific CoastSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Seven Up Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Abbott Laboratories v. DurrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Caudle v. CottonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Maddox v. FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Morris v. SartainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.