Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 7, 2002No. 1D00-2694PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

816 So.2d 199 (2002)

Alvin BROOKS, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D00-2694.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 7, 2002.

Petitioner pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Daniel A. David and Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

EN BANC

WEBSTER, J.

Petitioner seeks a belated appeal of his judgment and sentence, pursuant to what is now Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) (and prior to January 1, 2001, was rule 9.140(j)). In his petition, petitioner alleged only that at the time his sentence was imposed, the trial…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Benton; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Browning; Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Baggett v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  5. John Castellanos v. United States of America, Kevin B. Streete v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Childers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Cosby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Duggins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Childers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Childers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API