Childers v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, J.
On the merits, I concur with and dissent from the majority’s opinion for the same reasons expressed by Chief Judge Kahn in his separate opinion. This opinion addresses only the issue of the court’s en banc review of the instant case. In my judgment, before reaching its decision on the merits, the majority was first required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.331 to hurdle the substantial en banc obstacle demanding that the case be either one of maintaining uniformity in the court’s decisions, or of exceptional importance. Because the reason for the court’s exercise of such jurisdiction…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Western Pacific Railroad Corp. v. Western Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Pasco Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Florida Public Emp. Rel. Comm.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- In Re Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.