Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Christlieb

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 21, 1929No. 27,222PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Defendant had a verdict in this action for an assessment duly levied against him as a stockholder in a Minnesota corporation in process of liquidation, and plaintiff, the receiver, appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

Stating them as favorably for defendant as the record allows, the. facts are as follows: In 1902 there was organized under the laws of this state a corporation under the name of “United States Installment Realty Company” for the purpose of conducting a general investment business and the sale of contracts,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Hanover National Bank v. American Dock & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Pender v. . SpeightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Merchants' Bank v. RudolfNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Macomber v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. FreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Johnson v. BurmeisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API