Johnson v. Christlieb
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Defendant had a verdict in this action for an assessment duly levied against him as a stockholder in a Minnesota corporation in process of liquidation, and plaintiff, the receiver, appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
Stating them as favorably for defendant as the record allows, the. facts are as follows: In 1902 there was organized under the laws of this state a corporation under the name of “United States Installment Realty Company” for the purpose of conducting a general investment business and the sale of contracts,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Hanover National Bank v. American Dock & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Pender v. . SpeightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Merchants' Bank v. RudolfNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Macomber v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. FreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Johnson v. BurmeisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931