Legal Opinion

Schlim v. Gau

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1963No. File 10039PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRentto, J.

The plaintiff Schlim was injured while riding in his own car, which at the time it ran off the highway and collided with a tree, was being driven by the defendant Gau at the request of the plaintiff. In this action he seeks damages for injuries to his person which he claims were caused by the negligent manner in which Gau drove the car. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant on the ground that Schlim at the time he suffered his injuries was a guest without compensation under our guest statute which denies him a cause of action based on ordinary negligence. He appeals from the-…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Walton v. TullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Melby v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Lorch v. EglinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Ray v. HanischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Summers v. SummersIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Degenstein Ex Rel. Degenstein v. EhrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Western Surety Co. v. MydlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Coons, Richard C. v. Lawlor, Robert P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Friedhoff v. EngbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API