Legal Opinion
Bell v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 24, 2006No. A110274PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SWAGER, J.
This fourth appeal in a complex class action is confined to a single postjudgment order denying the defendant’s motion to modify the calculation of prejudgment interest in the judgment. We affirm.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs are former or current claims representatives working for Farmers Insurance Exchange (hereafter FIE), who filed this action October 2, 1996, seeking unpaid overtime compensation under Labor Code section 1194. They alleged that FIE had wrongfully refused to pay overtime compensation for a period beginning on October 1, 1993. In a ruling on a motion…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hodge v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Ayyad v. Sprint SpectrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- 311 SOUTH SPRING STREET CO. v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Brown v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Granite Outlet, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.