People v. Clark
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J. *
Defendant William James Clark was granted probation after a jury found him to be guilty of involuntary manslaughter. (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. (2).) He appeals contending: (1) He acted in self-defense as a matter of law. (2) The trial court erred in instructing the jury on involuntary manslaughter. (3) The prosecution introduced improper and prejudicial evidence of the peaceable character of the victim. (4) the trial court erred in requiring, as a condition of probation, that he make monthly payments to the children of the victim.
We hold: In light of the circumstances shown…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Thornton v. Dennis M.California Supreme Court · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- People v. PinholsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. BlakeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. BlakeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. . MinifieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.