Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Fairchild

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 12, 2009No. 26818-7-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBkown, J.

¶[1 An obligor parent is entitled to reimbursement for certain expenses not actually incurred by the obligee parent. RCW 26.19.080(3). In this case, a superior court judge reversed a commissioner’s reimbursement order, concluding Janis Davis, formerly known as Janis Fairchild, satisfied her burden of proof in showing day care and medical expenses were incurred. Her former husband, Daniel Fairchild, appeals, contending the burden of proof requires more than just a declaration that expenses were paid. We agree and reverse and remand.

FACTS

¶2 Mr. Fairchild and Ms. Davis have two daughters; one…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. ESCA Corp. v. KPMG Peat MarwickWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. ESCA Corp. v. KPMG Peat MarwickWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. RamerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. RamerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In re the Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BernardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Crystal Soto v. Evan PavlicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Estate Of Margaret L. Perthou-taylor. Alison Perthou, App. v. Cornelia Perthou Macconnel, Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Gam Thi Hong Ngo, Dob 8/30/1982 v. Thoai Gia Phan, Dob 5/5/1970Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Heidi Kaufman v. Geoffrey KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API