Legal Opinion
State v. Ford
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 15, 1989No. Nos. CA-3435, CA-3436PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Milligan, Judge.
The Licking County Common Pleas Court granted defendants’ motion to suppress all evidence found from the illegal search of their automobile. The state assigns a single error:
“Assignment of Error
“The trial court erred in granting the defendant-appellees’ motion to suppress evidence taken from their vehicle since reasonable suspicion based upon articulable facts was present to justify the brief detention.”
The following are the facts found by the trial court:
On January 12, 1989, at approximately 4:00 a.m., Licking County Sheriff Deputy Lenny Croghan pulled his cruiser behind an…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Richmond Hts. v. Myles, Unpublished Decision (2-9-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. GordonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. PearsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lyndhurst v. Yee, Unpublished Decision (2-17-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.