Legal Opinion

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Murphy

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 27, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We find no abuse of discretion in the decision of the Supreme Judicial Court (Wathen, J, sitting as a Single Justice) that disbarment is warranted here. The combination of (1) violating M.Bar R. 3.7(c)(1) by refusing to turn over a client’s file until counsel fees were paid; (2) violating M.Bar R. 3.6(j) and 3.7(h)(2) by communicating directly with adverse parties, willfully failing to provide to opposing counsel documents sent to the court and discussing the merits of the case ex parte; (3) violating M.Bar R. 3.2(f) by making unwanted sexual advances to a woman whom he, as a bail…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Mason James OuderkirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. North Atlantic Securities, LLC v. Office of SecuritiesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. Board of Overseers of the Bar v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. North Atlantic Securities, LLC v. Office of SecuritiesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API