Maryland Cas. Co. v. Neiman-Marcus Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
The suit was against several insurers for the recovery of losses the insured had sustained. The complaint, alleging that the defendants named had investigated the loss suffered and had agreed that the amount claimed, $80,344.52 was correct, set forth a schedule 1 apportioning it among the defendants. It then went on to say: that defendant, Maryland Casualty Company, had taken the position that the damage to plaintiff’s property sued for was not the result of the perils insured against by it; that it was, therefore, not liable for any part of the loss; and that the other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Cochran Oil Mill & Ginnery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Federal Ins. v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.