Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1940No. 7916PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARANT, Circuit Judge.

The question presented by this case is whether appellant or appellee was liable for $10,000 of a loss resulting from an automobile accident. Each had issued an insurance policy containing an omnibus clause which apparently covered the loss, but each claimed that this clause was made inoperative under the circumstances by another clause. Each admits that the loss was covered, and each paid $5,000 of it on the understanding that suit would later be brought by appellant to determine liability. Accordingly, suit was filed, in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Kentucky,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Curtis Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Bankers Indemnity InsOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Michigan Alkali Co. v. Bankers Indemnity Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Gutner v. Switzerland General Ins. Co. of ZurichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. United Services Automobile Association v. James B. RussomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. v. ClamorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API