Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 25, 1937No. 1842PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, District Judge.

This case is pending before me on defendant’s demurrer to the petition. The plaintiff is a New York corporation, the defendant a Connecticut corporation, and both are engaged in the general insurance business and admitted to do business in the commonwealth of Kentucky.

The Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Company, a corporation, is engaged in operating taxicabs and trucks for hire, and was the owner of a Chevrolet truck. The Kaufman Straus Company, a corporation, is engaged in the retail merchandising business at Louisville, Ky., and rented the above truck. The defendant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Cochran Oil Mill & Ginnery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Penn v. National Union Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Wilks v. Allstate Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Clow v. National Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Michigan Alkali Co. v. Bankers Indemnity Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Commercial Standard Ins. v. American Employers Ins.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API