Legal Opinion

Consolidation Coal Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 20, 1925No. A-262PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGRAham, Judge

This is an action to recover payment for bituminous coal claimed to have been requisitioned by the Navy under separate orders at two different times. The petition sets up two causes of action. The first cause of action grows out of an order designated N-69, which is dated the 10th of August, 1917, and covered shipments of coal beginning the latter part of June and terminating the 30th of September, 1917. The second cause of action grows out of two orders by the Navy Department, with modifications and extensions thereof Imown as N-6123 and N-6157, each dated the 12th day of June, 1919, for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Smelting and Refining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States Bedding Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  2. Blaze Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. General Services v. Little-Tex InsulationTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. American Satellite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  5. Pocahontas Fuel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API