Legal Opinion

Claybrook v. Acreman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1963No. 6636PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Justice.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiffs in a collision between a pickup truck and an automobile. Judgment was rendered for defendants based upon the answers of the jury to special issues.

Plaintiff Rosco Claybrook was driving the pickup truck with plaintiff, Ethel Clay-brook, his wife, riding with him. Defendant Billy Joe Acreman, a minor, was driving the automobile. Liability was also sought against defendant, W. M. Acreman, his father, on the theory of negligent en-trustment.

The jury found the defendant, Billy Joe Acreman, to be driving…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. SniderTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Tex-Jersey Oil Corporation v. BeckTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Johnson v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Houston Oxygen Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Johnson v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Sanders v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Dillard's Department Stores, Inc. v. Strom, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  5. Cowley v. PageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API