Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1947No. A-1307PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Justice.

In. this case petitioner recovered judgment for compensation against the respondent in the district court based upon answers of the jury to special issues. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment on two grounds. 202 S. W.2d 258. .. ■

One of the grounds upon which the trial court’s judgment was reversed was its refusal to submit to the jury a requested instruction relating to circumstantial evidence. The requested instruction was in this language: “Gentlemen of the Jury: You are charged as part of the law in this case ■ that any. fact before you may be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Texas Power & Light Co. v. CulwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation Dist. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Texas & N. O. R. v. CrowTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Hicks v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Placencio v. Allied Industrial International, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Owen Development Company v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Meyer v. Great American Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Adams v. Valley Federal Credit Union, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  5. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Petty Ex Rel. KauffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API