Legal Opinion

Board of Education v. Brophy

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 23, 1919PublishedCited by 17 opinions

On bill to quiet title. On pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, V. C.

By a deed dated December 24th, 1858, William Brophy and Mary, his wife, conveyed by deed of warranty, for the express consideration of one dollar, certain lands to “the Trustees of Union District School No. 9, of the Township of Aequackanonk.” The granting clause is to such trustees “and to their successors and assigns forever;” and the habendum “to said parties of the second part, their successors and assigns forever,” and so with the covenant of warranty.

The present controversy has arisen because of the following phrases in the deed (after the description of the land) : “Which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Munro v. Syracuse, Lake Shore & Northern RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Rector, Churchwardens & Vestrymen of St. Stephen's Protestant Episcopal Church v. Rector, Churchwardens & Vestrymen of Church of TransfigurationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Reutler v. RamsinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. The Riverton Country Club v. ThomasNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  3. Seltenreich v. Town of FairbanksDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952
  4. Pt. Pleasant Manor Building Co. v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Rusch v. MeloshNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API