Legal Opinion
Rothe Development Corp. v. U.S. Department of Defense
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided August 10, 2007No. CIV.A. SA-98-CV-1011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.
On this date, the Court considered Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 301) and Defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 318). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs motion for. summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed' to keep this case open.
The 1207 Program was originally enacted by Congress on November 14, 1986. It was reauthorized in 1989, 1992, 1999, and 2002, the last reauthorization being January 6, 2006. The Court finds that the 2006…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rothe Development Corp. v. Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Dynalantic Corp. v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Rothe Development Corp. v. U.S. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2009