Legal Opinion
Mattingly v. Eisenberg
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1955No. 5938PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Ida Eisenberg and Harry Eisen-berg, her husband, plaintiffs-appellees, and against Charles A. Mattingly and Anne R. Mattingly, husband and wife, defendants-appellants, for personal injuries suffered by Ida Eisenberg as a result of the alleged negligent operation of an automobile by defendant Charles A. Mattingly, and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial. For convenience the parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants.
On November 25, 1952 at about 6:30 p. m. defendant Charles A. Mattingly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- State v. HaroldArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Lawrence v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- State of Arizona v. DuguidArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. ChildressArizona Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Patricia Bach, Etc. v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- People v. ConternoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Raskey v. HulewiczNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
- Mutz v. LuceroArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Thompson v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.