Legal Opinion
United States v. Rhoades
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 3, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 4185PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOUS, District Judge.
The original defendant herein as third-party plaintiff has requested an order authorizing service of summons on the third-party defendant in the County of Lake in the State of Indiana.
Such application asse'rtedly is based upon Section 206 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1896, which in certain circumstances permits the service of summons on an original defendant in an action brought thereunder in any district wherein defendant resides or transacts business or wherein defendant may be found. However, no mentiorb whatsoever is made in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Creedon v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- United States v. RockhillDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1950
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schwartz v. BowmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Lyons v. Marrud, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Trussell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1964