Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
In this personal injury action the infant plaintiff claims that she was injured by Diethylstilbestrol ("DES”), a prescription drug manufactured by defendant-appellant, Eli Lilly and Co. Lilly defends on the ground that the drug was properly tested and was approved by the Federal Drug Administration. Doctor Don Carlos Hines was Lilly’s monitor for the testing of DES during the period 1940-1950. He is now 71 years old, is retired from Lilly’s employment, resides in California and claims to suffer from various allergies. He is said to be unable, or at least unwilling, to appear in New York for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carter v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. LaFatchDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974
- Gotthelf v. Hillcrest Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Rubino v. G. D. Searle & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1973
- Catapano v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Annunziato v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Roche v. UdellNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. WinborneNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Alava v. Peninsula General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Abelow v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.