Legal Opinion

Alpine Ridge Group v. Kemp

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 16, 1991No. C89-1654RPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROTHSTEIN, Chief Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the court on plaintiffs’ and defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Having reviewed the motions together with all documents filed in support and in opposition, having heard oral argument and being fully advised, the court finds and rules as follows:

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs in this case are owners of housing projects which fall under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f. The Section 8 housing program is administered by defendants Secretary and Department of Housing and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Leased Housing Association, and 189 Named v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Alpine Ridge Group v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Acacia Villa v. KempDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990
  4. Alpine Ridge Group, a Partnership Monroe Associates, a Limited Partnership Brentwood, a Limited Partnership Campbell Courts Associates, a Partnership Cheney Gardens Limited Partnership, a Limited Partnership, and Bitterroot Manor, a Limited Partnership, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Jack F. Kemp, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Urban Development U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Alpine Ridge Group, a Partnership Monroe Associates, a Limited Partnership Brentwood, a Limited Partnership Campbell Courts Associates, a Partnership Cheney Gardens Limited Partnership, a Limited Partnership v. Jack F. Kemp, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Urban Development U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Acacia Villa Alicia Park Apartments Amerige Villa Antelope Valley v. Jack Kemp, Sec. Hud, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API