Blankenship v. Computers & Training, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.
Attorney J. Thomas Haley appeals from a judgment requiring him to pay to Computers and Training, Inc. ("CAT") the costs and attorney's fees it incurred from pretrial conference through trial. The judgment is based on the trial court's finding that Haley's continued assertion of his client's suit against CAT, after a warning at the conference, was frivolous. The costs and fees were awarded pursuant to the frivolous claims statute, sec. 814.025(3)(b), Stats. We conclude that to the extent the finding of frivolousness on Haley's part results from the court's assessment of the credibility of his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Matter of Estate of BilsieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Stoll v. AdriansenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Radlein v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Sommer v. CarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. FridayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stern v. Thompson & Coates, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Dailey v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. RicciCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Morters v. Aiken & Scoptur, SCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004