Legal Opinion

Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Ricci

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 9, 2002No. 01-2186PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.

¶ 1. Ted Ricci appeals from a judgment in favor of Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc., that determined Hoey's lease of a billboard on Ricci's property is valid and enforceable. The judgment also requires Ricci to pay Hoey damages for cutting down the billboard and interfering with Hoey's relationship with the company that advertises on the billboard. Finally, the judgment requires Ricci to pay Hoey's costs and reasonable attorney fees because Ricci maintained a frivolous defense.

¶ 2. We affirm the trial court's conclusion that the lease is enforceable and that Ricci is liable for intentional…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stoll v. AdriansenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  2. Rabideau v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Dorr v. Sacred Heart HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. Stern v. Thompson & Coates, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bump v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. SokolowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. La Quinta Corp. v. Heartland Properties LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Anderson v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  4. BAD Holdings, LLC v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2022
  5. Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. SokolowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API