Cornell v. Crane
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo; Buck, J. Assumpsit by Hannah L. Cornell against Edgar A. Crane for money had and received. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action for money had and received. Although the record is voluminous, the real issues determined by the jury were simple, the facts are not much complicated, and the rules of law governing the case are well understood. The case, as made by plaintiff, was that in March, 1893, defendant held a mortgage of $2,200 on 160 acres of land in Van Burén county, which he represented was a first mortgage, and that the property was good security; that he at the time furnished to plaintiff a statement in writing, setting forth the facts in regard to the value of the land, in which appeared a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gridley v. Globe Tobacco Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Wylie v. GambleMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Seymour v. Detroit Copper & Brass Rolling MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Condon v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Bresnahan v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mesh v. CitrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Zadel v. SimonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Gyles v. StadelMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Heth v. OxendaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Simonds v. CashMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.