Heth v. Oxendale
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, elderly, of no considerable business experience except farming, resided on a farm near Ionia. The record indicates that they are kind, simple, and credulous. Mr. Heth was in poor health. Defendant William A. Oxendale is a real estate dealer and speculator. The other defendant is his wife. By chance he learned that plaintiffs had a piece of land for sale. The land was conveyed to defendants in exchange for a house and some lots in Lansing. Plaintiffs engaged Mr. Oxendale to look after the Lansing property, collect rents, pay taxes, etc., which he did. Defendants…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walker v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Roberts v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Davis v. Louisville Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Laubengayer v. RohdeMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Dougherty v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. SpragueMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Grabendike v. AdixMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Kelley v. HoogerhydeMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Gyles v. StadelMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.