Legal Opinion
Jernigan v. Richard
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided January 11, 2012No. CV-08-2332-PHX-GMSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER
G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are: (1) Motion for Summary Judgment by Pamela Elliott, the Town of .Gilbert, David Landgraf and Randy McLaws, collectively “the Gilbert Defendants” (Doc. 96), (2) Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof by Kyle Richard (“SA Richard”) (Doc. 145), (3) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Rachel Jernigan (Doc. 152), and (4) Plaintiffs Request to Disregard the Town Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs Statement of Additional Facts (Doc. 172). For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Donahoe v. ArpaioDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Dominguez v. Figueroa SanchaUnited States District Court · 2019