Legal Opinion
People v. Crossland
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The People appeal by permission from an order of the Appellate Division, First Department, which reversed upon the law, without considering the facts, a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York convicting the defendant Crossland, after a trial without a jury, of the crimes of knowingly possessing policy writings, knowingly possessing articles commonly used in the game of policy, and receiving money in the game of policy, and ordered a new trial.
The information contained three counts as indicated above. At the trial, the People produced one witness, Patrolman Juan…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- People v. . StraitNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- People v. PiersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Venuto v. LizzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- People v. OakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Romano v. StanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. FreshleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. GrangerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Avila v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1986
- Favicchio v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.