Legal Opinion

Venuto v. Lizzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Filomena Lizzo, as administratrix with the will annexed, etc.., from .an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Trial Term ¡and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 19th day of May, 1911, denying the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff and for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.:

The action is brought upon two promissory notes, purporting to have been made by the defendant’s testator, Antonio Lizzo., one for §1,000, dated October 4, 1907, payable to the order of the plaintiff six months from date at the Mechanics ¡and Traders’ Bank, and the other for §3,000, dated at Somma, Naples, February 6, 1908, payable to the order .of the plaintiff six months from date at the Mechanics and Traders’ Bank. "The plaintiff produced the notes upon the trial jand called :a witness, who had been payingteller of the Mechanics ¡and Traders’ Bank, where the said Lizzo had had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson Service Co. v. MaclernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boyd v. GosserSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  2. Culavin v. O'ConnorNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Stanley Co. of America v. Hercules Powder Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. People v. CrosslandNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. State v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API