Legal Opinion

Favicchio v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided June 30, 1989No. Claim No. 75798PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerard M. Weisberg, J.

CPLR 4515 provides that an expert witness “may state his opinion and reasons without first specifying the data upon *213which it is based.” Case law holds further that such testimony is not defective even if the underlying analysis is not provided on direct examination. The issues before us now, which are apparently ones of first impression, are: (1) does this evidentiary rule apply to a late claim motion; and (2) does a physician’s affidavit which opines that there has been a departure from good and accepted medical practice, without elaborating or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tarlowe v. Metropolitan Ski Slopes, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. 2641 Concourse Co. v. City University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. 2641 Concourse Co. v. City University of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1987
  4. People v. CrosslandNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Schreck v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nyberg v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API