Legal Opinion

People v. Yant

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 27, 1991No. 2-89-1059PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geiger

In this prosecution for driving with blood-alcohol concentration greater than or equal to .10 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 951/2, par. 11— 501(a)(1)), the court granted the motion of the defendant, William P. Yant, to suppress the evidence of his blood test. The State appeals from the suppression order. We reverse.

According to the stipulated statement of facts, on the evening of July 14, 1988, the defendant was in an automobile accident, then was transported by ambulance to Hinsdale Hospital. At the scene of the accident the defendant was combative and uncooperative; ambulance personnel “felt a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. FrazierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. People v. RomanoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. CoffinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. People v. EngelbrechtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. People v. CareyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Ruppel v. RamseyerDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1999
  5. People v. WuckertAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API