Legal Opinion

Aspy v. Botkins

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1903No. 19,992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Adams Circuit Court; D. J). Heller, Judge. Action by Isabelle Botkins against Hiram M. Aspy. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtG-illett, J.

Appellee’s amended complaint charged appellant, a physician and surgeon, with negligence in the treatment of an injury that appellee had received in and about her right knee. A demurrer to said pleading, on the ground that it failed to state sufficient facts, was overruled, and appellant excepted. On issue joined, there was a trial that resulted in a verdict for appellee. Appellant filed a motion for a. new trial, but his motion was overruled, and judgment was rendered for appellee upon the verdict. The assignments of error duly present the questions that w-e will hereafter discuss.

*172Appellant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Lane v. BoicourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Bigler v. ReyherIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Hemenway v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Vandalia Coal Co. v. YemmIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Hansen v. SandvikWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Angola Railway & Power Co. v. ButzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Underhill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API