Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Broderick v. Goldfogle
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtProskatjer, J.
In 1922 the Court of Appeals held invalid the then existing statute purporting to tax stock of national banks because it violated the prohibition of the United States Revised Statutes, section 5219, page 1009, as amended, against taxation of national bank shares at a greater rate than that imposed on other moneyed capital. People ex rel. Hanover Nat. Bank v. Goldfogle, 234 N. Y. 345. The legislature thereupon enacted chapter 897 of the Laws of 1923, amending the Tax Law, and providing in section 25, as amended, that “ moneyed capital coming into competition with the business of national…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Railroad Co. v. PenistonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Trustees of the Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Citizens' Telephone Co. of Grand Rapids v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- First National Bank v. City of HartfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Merchants' National Bank v. Dawson CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- People ex rel. Broderick v. GoldfogleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- In re the Estate of AdamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- People ex rel. Peabody, Houghteling & Co. v. GoldfogleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.