Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Peabody, Houghteling & Co. v. Goldfogle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

The relator is a New York corporation, organized to carry on business of an investment company, with powers as defined in the Banking Law, in addition to powers conferred by the General Corporation Law and the Stock Corporation Law, exclusive, however, of powers stated in subdivisions 4 and 5 of section 293 of the Banking Law, and without power to receive deposits or to issue its own debenture bonds or notes secured by deed or deeds of trust.

The relator was conducting its business at 366 Madison avenue, New York city, such business consisting solely of (1) purchasing *711with its own…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. National Exchange Bank of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API