Legal Opinion
United States v. Earnest Norman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 2, 1968No. 19875_1PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
Earnest Norman appeals from his conviction on three counts of an indictment charging violations of the narcotic laws, 1 and from the subsequent denial of a motion for a new trial.
One of his arguments in this court is that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury verdict of guilty.
The only evidence received at the trial was that which was produced by the Government. That evidence reflects the product of what has become almost classic procedure by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics in gathering evidence against persons suspected of narcotics violations.
On the morning…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Walter Augustus Bowe, Robert Steele Collier, and Khaleel Sultarn SayyedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Anton Vaughn Evalt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Michael Newman and Frank X. Gaca. Appeal of Frank X. GacaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Walter Seifert and Jack EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Kenneth GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.