Legal Opinion
Amluxen v. Regents of University of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1975No. Civ. 35866PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEINBERGER, J. *
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus to direct respondent to set aside the layoff of plaintiff and appellant and to reinstate her with full salary.
The petition for writ of mandate was filed in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco on April 13, 1973.
On August 10, 1973, the trial court issued a notice of intended decision to deny the petition. On August 14, 1973, appellant filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, and after the lapse of almost nine months the court signed and filed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Yellin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rendell Noel Mabey, Jr. v. Ronald ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Franz v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Smith v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- American Funeral Concepts v. Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Apte v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.